From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Upcoming 23.1 release Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:10:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83my6yohnp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ws63cij1.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248145837 26401 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2009 03:10:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, ynyaaa@ybb.ne.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 21 05:10:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MT5kL-00056G-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 05:10:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33062 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MT5kK-0006J0-Gj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MT5kE-0006Im-5a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MT5kC-0006Ia-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34401 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MT5kC-0006IX-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il ([84.95.2.7]:11305) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MT5kC-0008AZ-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KN4006003EA5H00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:10:18 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.246.110]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KN400FJ63H6M9G1@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:10:18 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112884 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:43:24 +0900 > Cc: ynyaaa@ybb.ne.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I've just got a bug report about tar-mode on Windows. > Here's the translation of the report (original in Japanese) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > On Windows, when we edit a tar file in tar-mode, the file is > broken. It seems that this is because > default-buffer-file-coding-system is japanese-shift-jis-dos, > and thus this eol-conversion takes effect on writing a tar > file. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On Windows, the value of default-buffer-file-coding-system is always SOMETHING-dos. So this fact alone is not the correct explanation, because tar-mode works for me with iso-latin-1-dos. Please ask the user to provide a reproducible test case. Thanks.