From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: t and nil in pure memory? Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:06:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83my2so094.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200911112023.nABKNrH6023933@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257998912 6820 80.91.229.12 (12 Nov 2009 04:08:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 05:08:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8Qyu-00037z-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:08:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36540 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8Qyu-0003hJ-DJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:08:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8Qyp-0003hE-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:08:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8Qyk-0003gR-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:08:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40304 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8Qyk-0003gM-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:55948) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8Qyj-0000JL-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KSZ00A009V4OO00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:08:12 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KSZ0081CA5NOE80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:08:12 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <200911112023.nABKNrH6023933@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116860 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:23:53 -0800 (PST) > From: Dan Nicolaescu > > > The last GC before dumping generates 200K calls to mark_object, of those > 20K have Qt or Qnil as an argument. I don't think this matters enough to bother: even if we consider GC too slow (and I don't think so), this is only 10% of it, so even reducing it to zero will give only a marginal speedup.