From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing the gnutls support Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:37:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83mxqnmqqy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r5g0x0fd.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286631462 14351 80.91.229.12 (9 Oct 2010 13:37:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 13:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 09 15:37:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4ZcJ-0006CD-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:37:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43757 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P4ZcI-00011R-OZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50139 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P4ZcA-000116-Oo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P4Zc6-0002P7-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P4Zc5-0002Ov-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LA000100Z3LXY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:37:24 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.148.82]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LA0001WTZ6AN950@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:37:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131526 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:18:16 +0200 > Cc: gnutls-devel@gnu.org > > However, if I set the debugging level to 9, I get the following: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (file-error "writing to process" "interrupted system call" #>) > process-send-string(#> "GET /market.php HTTP/1.0.\n.\n") That's strange. process-send-string calls emacs_write to write to the process, but emacs_write already handles EINTR, by retrying the write which failed. So why does this signal raise a Lisp error?