From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bzr Emacs question Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:12:32 +0200 Message-ID: <83mwy6zx7z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <23373.1353776529@olgas.newt.com> <83pq32zyz5.fsf@gnu.org> <87vccuuc3w.fsf@olgas.newt.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353780797 24899 80.91.229.3 (24 Nov 2012 18:13:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bill Wohler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 24 19:13:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TcKEJ-0006aa-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:13:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcKE8-0001w4-8g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:13:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcKE5-0001vB-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:13:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcKE4-0001Fx-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:13:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:39767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcKE4-0001Fq-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:13:12 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ME000H007UBBA00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:12:35 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ME000HM97WR2H60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:12:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87vccuuc3w.fsf@olgas.newt.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155064 Archived-At: > From: Bill Wohler > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:47:31 -0800 > > > A tag is not a revision-id by itself. Try > > > > bzr up -r tag:mh-e-8.3.1 > > Not surprisingly, that produces the same error. I guess I don't understand what your "bzr tag" command did. What is "emacs-24.1" in that command? > Note that "bzr help revisionspec" says: > > Alternately, [the revision] can be given without a keyword, in which > case it will be checked as a revision number, a tag, a revision id, > a date specification, or a branch specification, in that order. And you are willing to bet your life on that it guesses right? ;-) > > (And I'm not sure you really want "up" and not some other command, but > > that's another story.) > > What would you recommend as an alternative to "svn up -r"? I don't know, I never used SVN seriously. What did you want to accomplish?