From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:50:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83mwxk7wub.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcc9aa4a.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj7c8fkn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355284253 32473 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2012 03:50:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 12 04:51:07 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TidLd-0007mp-VH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:51:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35712 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidLR-0003qA-Bh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidLN-0003ps-OR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:50:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidLK-0003wg-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:50:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:55715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TidLK-0003vz-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEW00C00FRW0500@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:50:25 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEW00BUSG00ZV30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:50:25 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155501 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:55:58 -0500 > > >> As expected. So, if compiling the C sources takes 1 min and compiling > >> the Lisp files takes 6.5 min, how come the bootstrap takes 15 min? > >> What else takes 7.5 min? > > I don't know. It seems that a bootstrap is not equivalent to the sum > > of the two commands we've measured. > > Indeed, there are various other things like leim, info, and whatnot. Leim takes much less than a minute, and info is not built as part of the Windows bootstrap. > Could it be that when you compiled the files, you used an `emacs' that > was dumped from .elc files, whereas when you bootstrap, you compile the > files with an `emacs' that was dumped from .el files? Yes, but that can only explain a 25% increase in time.