From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (0 <= i && i < N) is not "backwards" Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:09:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83mwtr1pow.fsf@gnu.org> References: <514F88E9.2020600@cs.ucla.edu> <83d2un3n7t.fsf@gnu.org> <515060C7.2070602@cs.ucla.edu> <83obe71qew.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364224209 27580 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2013 15:10:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, schwab@linux-m68k.org, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 25 16:10:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UK92d-0003aA-1S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:10:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37455 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UK92F-0005sm-6r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UK927-0005r1-EM for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UK921-0003hy-V5 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UK921-0003eL-KU for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:09:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MK800B001VIKO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:09:25 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MK800BIR23O7W90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:09:25 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158150 Archived-At: > From: Noah Lavine > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:58:28 -0400 > Cc: Paul Eggert , Andreas Schwab , > Emacs development discussions > > To continue a tangent, if adding an explicit isnan() makes the code run any > slower, I think you should file a bug with GCC to get that fixed. I don't think GCC is a problem: isnan is a builtin function there, so even a function call overhead is spared.