From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:58:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvvrrnvs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5610207A.2000300@harpegolden.net> <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <5612E996.7090700@yandex.ru> <83bnc7tavr.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp0ngksh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zizrrqs2.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhbbggz4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83si5jroxg.fsf@gnu.org> <87egh3gfu7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444474740 31537 80.91.229.3 (10 Oct 2015 10:59:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: adatgyujto@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 10 12:58:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkrrX-0001Mg-QK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:58:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkrrX-000131-8V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48337) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkrrI-00012n-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkrrH-0000Qg-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:44553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zkrr8-0000NQ-IS; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 06:58:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NW000F003PNKG00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:58:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NW000F1A3TCIT40@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:58:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87egh3gfu7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191125 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: adatgyujto@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:47:44 +0200 > > > I hope it is. All I have is my personal example; > > Your personal example was not about a policy and decision outside of > your influence You don't know all the details. I also don't see how the exact cause for rejection of existing work can matter here. > ruling your work unwelcome. Ah, so we are again talking about hurt feelings? > Your example was about overcoming technical difficulties and surpassing > a threshold of code/performance quality. Policy decisions can be easily translated into "technical difficulties", by writing more code.