From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:11:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83mvuoo1pl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <563ABD66.6070700@yandex.ru> <563AC64E.9060105@yandex.ru> <87twp0d2xp.fsf@md5i.com> <563B5E82.8070003@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447002743 17989 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2015 17:12:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 17:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mwd@md5i.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 08 18:12:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvTVh-0004Jd-B1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 18:12:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48190 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvTVb-0005SQ-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvTVX-0005SK-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:12:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvTVT-00012k-Rd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:11:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:37291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvTVT-00012g-Ji; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 12:11:55 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXI00000ADRD400@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:11:54 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXI000M2AFT3V50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:11:54 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193624 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 08:30:17 -0800 > Cc: mwd@md5i.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru > > If that's the case, it changes my thoughts on what needs to be in core, and > what should be in ELPA. Until now I was thinking ELPA required Internet > access; but if there are parts of ELPA that "come in the box", then I'd like > to see more packages there. ELPA requires Internet access if you are building from the repository. My greatest fears are that packages that move from core to ELPA will get much less attention from the core maintenance team, which will eventually degrade their quality.