From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master a3b2101 1/2: New file with obarray functions. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:48:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83mvukjm9o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20151111165602.28114.31123@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447274920 3319 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2015 20:48:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esperanto@cumego.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 21:48:29 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcJg-0005TD-KZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:48:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcJg-00009Y-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcJT-000091-Hm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcJQ-0005lm-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:48:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwcJQ-0005lX-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:48:12 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXO006004CL9W00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:48:11 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXO006YP4GA9B00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:48:10 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194139 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 15:26:53 -0500 > Cc: Przemys=C5=82aw Wojnowski >=20 > Funnily enough, I think we should discourage the use of obarrays. At the very least we should fix these new warnings: ELC obarray.elc In toplevel form: obarray.el:45:1:Warning: Lexical argument shadows the dynamic varia= ble obarray obarray.el:50:1:Warning: Lexical argument shadows the dynamic varia= ble obarray obarray.el:55:1:Warning: Lexical argument shadows the dynamic varia= ble obarray obarray.el:60:1:Warning: Lexical argument shadows the dynamic varia= ble obarray