From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pacifying "might not be defined at runtime" warning Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 21:03:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvnzcdmw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <573031FB.8090709@cs.ucla.edu> <85e67092-e3ae-b38c-6587-6ed61a445949@cs.ucla.edu> <83vb2nchgk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462817036 18948 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2016 18:03:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 18:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 20:03:55 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1azpX8-0000Qw-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 20:03:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azpX7-0000jj-KP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 14:03:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azpWt-0000eG-T8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 14:03:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azpWo-0008Gm-QF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 14:03:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1azpWo-0008GM-Me; Mon, 09 May 2016 14:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4804 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1azpWn-0007Va-Ih; Mon, 09 May 2016 14:03:34 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Mon, 9 May 2016 10:34:34 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203732 Archived-At: > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 10:34:34 -0700 > > > Does using declare-function help? > > > Yes, the attached patches suffice to pacify the byte compiler for the > source files under lisp/vc. If this is the recommended way to pacify, > I'll install them in master. I believe this is the way, yes.