From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 16:56:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvlsi67d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56BE7E37.3090708@cs.ucla.edu> <4hd1rw1ubr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83vb50wxhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y49vz4cg.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87twg2g86g.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83eg76n5h5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y45eeoor.fsf@lifelogs.com> <577D42BB.1020500@cs.ucla.edu> <87oa694rfw.fsf@russet.org.uk> <837fcxlbay.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh1d2wg5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83eg75jk5h.fsf@gnu.org> <87y45c5py7.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467986225 20065 80.91.229.3 (8 Jul 2016 13:57:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 08 15:57:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bLWH8-0003MZ-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:57:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLWH8-00042p-7t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44193) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLWH2-00042X-L2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:56:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLWGx-0004EB-EK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLWGx-0004E7-BU; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3338 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bLWGv-0007en-6o; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 09:56:49 -0400 In-reply-to: <87y45c5py7.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205433 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:28:32 +0100 > > >> I think I have discussed this with you before. You have to create > >> multiple feature branches, or do strange things, rather than just > >> rebase, force push. > > > > What's the problem with multiple branches? It's a very easy > > technique, and also very safe. > > I think a system where you start off with > > feature/my-new-feature > feature/my-new-feature-1 > feature/my-new-feature-2 > > with consecutive squashes is not a good system. That's because you decided to squash. You don't have to.