From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Debugging GNU Emacs on MS Windows / getting control back to gdb Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 22:17:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvk6aq3j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86pop2je7e.fsf@realize.ch> <83wpjaayfs.fsf@gnu.org> <86h9aejcj0.fsf@realize.ch> <83r39iar9z.fsf@gnu.org> <868tvqj5x7.fsf@realize.ch> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471807145 13298 195.159.176.226 (21 Aug 2016 19:19:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 21 21:19:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYGp-00033q-N2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:18:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37931 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYGn-0001c2-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYG8-0001XP-HT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYG4-0006EZ-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYG4-0006ED-8F; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4672 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYFq-0004EN-CB; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:18:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <868tvqj5x7.fsf@realize.ch> (message from Alain Schneble on Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:08:52 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206732 Archived-At: > From: Alain Schneble > CC: > Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:08:52 +0200 > > >> Actually, I just found > >> http://www.mingw.org/wiki/Workaround_for_GDB_Ctrl_C_Interrupt, compiled > >> it and it works! > >> > >> This allows us to call debugbreak.exe [PID] and control goes back to > >> gdb! > > > > How is this different from "gdb -p PID"? > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that works only once, just after > attaching to the process. But if I then continue execution, there is no > way to again suspend the process and return control to GDB. No, you misunderstand me. I think when you attach the second GDB, the first one gets control. No?