From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC]: replace-region-contents Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 19:33:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83mun8styg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871s4rqk7u.fsf@gnu.org> <87o97syvno.fsf@gnu.org> <878syubwv3.fsf@gnu.org> <87y36u9xqt.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1ietcox.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1iew3u6.fsf@gnu.org> <83va1wsy95.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8dgetp1.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="159747"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 06 18:35:56 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1grR75-000fOx-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:35:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grR74-0003FN-K1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 12:35:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grR4l-0002Nh-HX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 12:33:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grR4k-0007SD-E8; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 12:33:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4536 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1grR4g-0004WR-21; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 12:33:29 -0500 In-reply-to: <87h8dgetp1.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Tassilo Horn on Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:02:34 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233055 Archived-At: > From: Tassilo Horn > Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:02:34 +0100 > > The bottleneck is `compareseq' in lib/diffseq.h. Of course. > Maybe that could signal if more than some maximum number of > differences have already been found, and in that case > `replace-buffer-contents' would fallback to a plain delete and > insert? There's the too_expensive member that we currently set to a very large value; maybe we should set it lower? or provide control on it from Lisp? Also, there's the EARLY_ABORT macro that can be defined to cause an early return when the job is too hard. Maybe you could try defining it to something appropriate?