From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should `revert-buffer' preserve text-scaling by default?
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 18:09:05 +0200
Message-ID: <83muc9jsri.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87fti6toq7.fsf@red-bean.com> <83pnhao1re.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwvr21ql7ce.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <8736e6tm51.fsf@red-bean.com>
 <83imn1omkf.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0d8xxzu.fsf@red-bean.com>
 <jwv4kyjewp5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <8736e3scxq.fsf@red-bean.com>
 <83o8wqln5f.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnh6ve5v.fsf@red-bean.com>
 <83eexmlj34.fsf@gnu.org> <87fti2s6nu.fsf@red-bean.com>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="164473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 17:25:07 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1icAz5-000gec-I0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 17:25:07 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55772 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1icAz4-0001w5-8W
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:25:06 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60832)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1icAjw-0001WE-M8
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:09:35 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58281)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1icAjn-0000fO-Ak; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:09:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3469 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1icAjj-0004Wu-Kn; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:09:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <87fti2s6nu.fsf@red-bean.com> (message from Karl Fogel on Mon, 02
 Dec 2019 16:29:25 -0600)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243056
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/243056>

> From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:29:25 -0600
> 
> What is the process by which we might eventually decide to change the default to non-nil (that is, to *not* resetting modes)?
> 
> In other words, how will the mere passage of time affect our willingness to change the default interactive behavior?

By letting people try this and tell us via bug reports and other
communications channels that they'd like this to be the default.