From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:15:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83mu7nqt5l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <20200405195753.GG5049@ACM> <6d234b0b-72e4-5f86-4bd0-09437471ac92@gmx.at> <20200407114701.GB4009@ACM> <1e322291-a71a-0e24-2179-5197fb2c9f41@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="3098"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 07 16:16:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLp22-0000hh-Qh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 16:16:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLp21-0008Ab-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:16:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLp0U-0006vB-NK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:15:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLp0T-0006RF-K6; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:15:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3010 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jLp0L-0000vm-Fd; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 10:15:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1e322291-a71a-0e24-2179-5197fb2c9f41@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:45:42 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246601 Archived-At: > From: martin rudalics > Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 14:45:42 +0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rrandresf@gmail.com, > Dmitry Gutov , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > As a matter of fact, it is slightly better. Still, Emacs locks down > after a few scrolls in a similar way as without it. Maybe showing profiles for when Emacs locks up with and without that setting could give some hints about what's going on?