From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Drop the Copyright Assignment requirement for Emacs
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 21:18:44 +0300
Message-ID: <83mu6e9vy3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com>
 <jwvk126t1ve.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <GaXnOajiVipGGqduq8uXZgT6H_KvgjwF3NBXW-cDfW9zm5_9h-qM4L9dMKvcKiCi_dLlyPISzSschHEXYc3zzgSIBE6HcY78tXsLQZSCC7M=@protonmail.com>
 <87d07xamrg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <jwvh7x9svmk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <jwvzhb1r3ir.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <E1jWWVT-0002MP-7U@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <jwvftcc5sjl.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <E1jWt6N-0005Gr-Vv@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <CADwFkm=9cgGJLrYoYYbzOFwOwbkbFYW+fviFDawU6kA_1brU3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <jwvimh6v4td.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83zhaih0oz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwvzhaitijc.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83pnbegsvm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <547c9116-c1c3-8563-4aee-c62aa2302861@yandex.ru> <838shybfdo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <3f79ff6e-2471-fa6d-08ff-682afd504eca@yandex.ru> <83v9l29yz3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <88122768-762b-01a1-7cb4-df96e838cf41@yandex.ru>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="28485"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 20:19:30 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jYD1U-0007Gd-Ez
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:19:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jYD1T-00086z-Fw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:19:27 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42092)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jYD0r-0007Sx-KQ
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:18:50 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43324)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jYD0q-0007Go-WF; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:18:49 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4387 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jYD0q-00073X-Ai; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:18:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <88122768-762b-01a1-7cb4-df96e838cf41@yandex.ru> (message from
 Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 11 May 2020 20:28:27 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249851
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/249851>

> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:28:27 +0300
> 
> On 11.05.2020 20:13, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > We can say the same without having the packages in ELPA, we just need
> > to tell them in addition to set up package.el for MELPA.
> 
> Then, if MELPA suffers a security breach, we will likely be taking a 
> significant part of the blame.

No, we won't.  The responsibility is on the end-user and on MELPA
admins.