From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:43:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83mtw02pow.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <87czwzfn9p.fsf@telefonica.net> <87eehfnd83.fsf@gnus.org> <1fb773f6-1480-53ce-08ae-1f7d0ba23428@yandex.ru> <87k0r637k4.fsf@gnus.org> <80e8c434-888d-23c5-13f0-c513bbf13ee4@yandex.ru> <8735xtznrh.fsf@gnus.org> <70fd2374-23ea-1c03-a4e4-97a370a41acf@yandex.ru> <87h7m9wjvl.fsf@gnus.org> <878s7kutzl.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn0w2qaf.fsf@gnu.org> <9312a5b3-41f3-f6f2-cc2b-f8c7e03d31ed@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26871"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 13:44:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lD590-0006tS-62 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:44:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40102 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD58z-0008Jq-4H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:44:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD57q-0006hd-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lD57o-00016u-TS; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:43:13 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2865 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lD57o-0001Sq-33; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 07:43:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <9312a5b3-41f3-f6f2-cc2b-f8c7e03d31ed@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:35:12 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265237 Archived-At: > Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:35:12 +0200 > > On 19.02.2021 14:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > That's not necessarily true. We also use ;;;###autoload as the means > > to load a mode when some command is invoked. > > I think that means that such commands don't need to be tagged (since > they can be called before the mode is even defined). You mean, they _should_not_ be tagged, yes?