From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 15:13:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtq4q9s5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210727211521.15408.98852@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210727211523.AE6F72065F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <877dhabg5s.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgu6h0e1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a6m6tn0e.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1figz3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgu4ri8b.fsf@gnus.org> <837dh8s6fj.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf5oqdem.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8akqd0u.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6m4qcg5.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31382"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, leungbk@mailfence.com, juri@linkov.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 30 14:15:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9RQC-00081P-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:15:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33446 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9RQ9-0004FC-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:15:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9ROy-0003W4-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9ROv-0007tI-VG; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1993 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9ROv-0003lf-In; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:14:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a6m4qcg5.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:16:10 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271839 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, juri@linkov.net, leungbk@mailfence.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 13:16:10 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > We cannot do anything with some theses "warnings" shown at bootstrap > > time, so how would it be useful to display warnings there? > > I don't get any warnings when saying "make bootstrap"? Which ones are > you referring to? Generating loaddefs.el in a clean repository always reports a couple of prefixes it won't register, and for a good reason. > >> On the other hand, my personal advice is to use admin/emake, which > >> filters out all the junk so that you don't have to read anything > >> carefully. :-) > > > > I think this is sub-optimal, at least for active developers of Emacs. > > No one said a message shown by the build is only important when it's a > > warning. > > emake doesn't filter out everything that's a not a warning, so I don't > follow you here. Then I don't understand why you mentioned it. Juri wants this to be a warning because evidently he disregards (or maybe actually filters out) anything that isn't a warning or an error message. That's why I said other messages are also worthy of us paying attention.