From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Name dtache.el
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 18:50:00 +0300
Message-ID: <83mtfc9pav.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87y1zq5vt7.fsf@posteo.net>
 <jwv7d7ayyh4.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87wnf56ix0.fsf@posteo.net>
 <87sfpt6ikz.fsf@posteo.net> <jwv35hs31aw.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <E1nnqS6-0005nk-Am@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zgjq33tb.fsf@posteo.net>
 <87a6bccmfh.fsf@posteo.net> <jwvfsl42s8y.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="9969"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: niklas.eklund@posteo.net, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 20 17:52:19 2022
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ns4vL-0002Ob-58
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 May 2022 17:52:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35258 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1ns4vK-0004PT-2E
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:52:18 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38508)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1ns4t7-0002rF-UZ
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:50:02 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55950)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1ns4t7-0000Yn-L7; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:50:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=IKLvMYjDKHjEmrrfHeT1L7lKbJ3xbBX/F4B+PpPG6SM=; b=R+SLpmtJAha7
 Nao/XYK1Ax9XMjYa3XTpZdWPhc1TqEcTp2jB67fToXF3RS6Ewd114w/fM/NM+mnJDYGY/gIHQiq/F
 uOF9deUj2IkRmrnrfu0t2M09TM6NcxZ2Sa2Bvxjb8y0uzmKnG/6ZBmO3V+HQ0RvQgV6AP6VAaJrhi
 d6KlYziQXmUqaYv43y8z/ptBVBuPTTHoGvDLrgzFlsgNF4NWKGWvzh94hFQsmI5diUi58NiGS4i88
 k/LbWKjRU80SP6eXO6I1JlwPN27KD5YRLNFvifl2B8Mny3oprxYYzXI1nb2apJwEHMJjjCSkAKgF7
 DU69Szal9ApbF0/JtUsm4A==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1270 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1ns4t6-000242-Oh; Fri, 20 May 2022 11:50:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <jwvfsl42s8y.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Fri, 20 May 2022 10:31:52 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290007
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/290007>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: rms@gnu.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 10:31:52 -0400
> 
> Niklas Eklund [2022-05-20 14:23:46] wrote:
> > I have gotten around to update the name of the package from dtache ->
> > detached.el.
> 
> Is it really necessary?

Maybe it isn't, but the new name is definitely better, IMO.