From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A feature to go to last edit locations Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 05:25:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83mt5hdj28.fsf@gnu.org> References: <972bedcc-37c9-5180-ac41-90e25d854a63@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mardani29@yahoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 14 04:26:41 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pRlxp-0003Il-EL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 04:26:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRlxP-0000NU-EP; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRlxO-0000Mq-Hm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRlxO-0005Vr-1u; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:26:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=mgNCEi/nryhrCpchBFn/Mo/R4k0f8M6lnDQb3e1/6+0=; b=Rb0QI0pQ0ON+ nhI47ig7cMD7e7/slBWUlsk9qR8uEnWdnbmLtIcv7ErDYkcuDGObqOEESXapO8cxz3af2dehZO/9d Rq7rV+607271cx4EsUTm70DhAmUylqWpwjzquxRcpvjwYjpmiW0kEyTlvF2wgl8qcpJ+qd/s7SpTj hhNqPMP+1S5IT2HhnANgUT0dFNe32ctMOl5kUwmNgBT9wKfMnyQsS1kRlieytdSRyBRM3ggQJHmr7 I1DcrgMDo4DCdqK11mBiyC1Q4CqgW/uFT/ap94Q486MEerV4/lfUPWqQs5YSW0SjDTGXqG46ixfBV 2zbJGViZ4thaJKv6CNCSKA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRlxN-0006q2-2s; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:26:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:41:19 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303253 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:41:19 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 13/02/2023 21:24, Jean Louis wrote: > > But Eli said something important, why go somewhere back randomly, but > > better going where user marked it to need it. > > Because by the time the user knows they need to go back, they might have > missed the opportunity to mark the place. The important question is: which of these two failures could happen more frequently? IME, wading through gobs of places I never wanted to go back to is no fun.