unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
Cc: ulm@gentoo.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Case mapping of sharp s
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:12:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83lji6mgg4.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tl7d43ir7w1.fsf@m17n.org>

> From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:06:38 +0900
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> In article <19200.4158.380820.761685@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> writes:
> 
> > In Unicode since version 5.1.0 the U+1E9E code point is assigned to
> > "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S". Would it be possible to add a mapping
> > from this to the lower case ß, as in the patch below?
> 
> > However, I've noticed that similar mappings for Turkish ı (dotless i)
> > and İ (I with dot) were commented out [1]. Is it still so that such a
> > change would "make searches slow", as stated in the comment?
> 
> That kind of setting surely makes the searching of ß and ẞ
> slow because we can't use BM search when case-fold-search is
> non-nil.  BM search is possible only when all
> case-equivalent characters are represented by the same byte
> length, and differ only in the last byte.

I think we need to solve this limitation anyway, if we want a decent
support for Unicode.  There are many more pairs of characters that
should normally be considered equal in search.

Wouldn't the technique described in UTS 18
(http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/) help here?





  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-16 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-15 14:29 Case mapping of sharp s Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-16 12:06 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-16 16:38   ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-17  7:36     ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-17 21:23       ` Reiner Steib
2009-11-16 19:12   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-11-17  7:43     ` martin rudalics
2009-11-17  7:49     ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-17 18:56       ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-18  1:00         ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-18  4:09           ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-18  5:33             ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-18  6:26             ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-18 14:44               ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 19:05                 ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-19  1:16                   ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 17:58               ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-19  1:57                 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-19 19:48 grischka
2009-11-19 21:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-19 22:43   ` David Kastrup
2009-11-20  2:08     ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20  8:03       ` David Kastrup
2009-11-20 14:14         ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20  3:41     ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-20  4:20       ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-20  7:13         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-21  0:02           ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-21 12:39             ` David Kastrup
2009-11-21 17:40               ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-21 19:15                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-22  2:58                   ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-22  4:28                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-22  8:27                       ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-23  1:30                 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-21 22:52               ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-20  8:10     ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-20 11:46       ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-20 14:43         ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-21  4:33           ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-11-19 23:25   ` grischka
2009-11-20  2:11     ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-21  3:08       ` grischka
2009-11-21  8:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-21  9:33           ` Andreas Schwab
2009-11-21 11:45             ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-21 15:33           ` grischka
2009-11-21 10:41         ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-21 11:58           ` Andreas Schwab
2009-11-21 17:01             ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-22 12:11               ` Andreas Schwab
2009-11-22 20:15                 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-24 12:26             ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-24 19:23               ` grischka
2009-11-25  2:13                 ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-26 13:07                   ` grischka
2009-11-29 22:03                   ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-30  1:22                     ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-30  1:28                     ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-30  1:36                       ` Kenichi Handa
2009-11-30  7:01                     ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-11-30 12:01                       ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-30 13:09                         ` martin rudalics
2009-11-30 21:57                       ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-30 22:34                         ` Ulrich Mueller
2009-12-01  0:02                           ` Juri Linkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83lji6mgg4.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=handa@m17n.org \
    --cc=ulm@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).