From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug statistics Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:22:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83lja2c7a9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1focf1eb1p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874ogsthn2.fsf@red-bean.com> <83fx0be7ad.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277554868 22454 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2010 12:21:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 26 14:21:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSUNd-0008Qi-Gm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 14:21:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32952 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSUNc-0001HS-PI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52188 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSUNV-0001Fm-WC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSUNT-0005Rc-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:63157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSUNR-0005R3-Jj; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 08:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L4M00600FHM2Y00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:20:52 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.155.52]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L4M0015OFMRJQF0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:20:52 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126430 Archived-At: > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:01:07 -0400 > Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Speaking for myself (TM): the switch to Bazaar made it MUCH HARDER to contribute. > It takes 5-15 minutes (sometimes even longer) to check in anything, > even for trivial changes. > If making / testing a change is quicker than the time to check it in, > it makes one think twice before trying to do anything. Would using "bzr ci --local" for several changes, followed by a single "bzr push" help here? Would it do any harm to the master repository?