From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Convert non-ASCII letters to hexadecimal? vs control chars. Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:44:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83lj5q8ydp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fww040oi.fsf@jidanni.org> <83tykf8m6i.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287733553 12688 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2010 07:45:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 22 09:45:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P9CJq-0000AC-Qq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:45:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9CJh-0003gt-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:45:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41517 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9CJS-0003eG-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9CJO-0003Cg-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:56491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9CJO-0003CZ-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LAO00900LHYJ200@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.29.140]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LAO008AXLIHZZD0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131972 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:22:24 -0400 > > I'm fine with sending random bytes, without removing them first and > without asking the user, yes. We can either assume they'll get QP > or base64 encoded down the line or that it doesn't matter. FWIW, for me a bug report encoded in base64 is a non-starter. Even qp is a turn-off. But that's me.