From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature" Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:14:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83lifsdlsm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lig3yaci.fsf@gnu.org> <505CC1FA.4070300@cs.ucla.edu> <874nmglvp4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <83zk48egzb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348989312 16867 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2012 07:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 07:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 09:15:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TIDkC-0003Mu-34 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:15:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32841 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIDk6-0000Ev-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIDk4-0000EX-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIDk3-0000bR-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIDk3-0000YH-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MB500B00IRJSV00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:14:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MB500BNGISLM650@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:14:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153731 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Juri Linkov , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 21:48:39 -0400 > > I still would prefer going back to having the easserts in macros rather > than in functions (so that the assertion itself immediately gives you > the line-number, without having to go through the addr2line rigmarole). Sorry, I don't follow: the eassert macro includes the file name and the line number in the message it prints, together with the condition that was violated.