From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:59:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83lhbl5nan.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <56023A6C.3020302@yandex.ru> <5602BE3E.1050009@yandex.ru> <5602C4DE.8020105@yandex.ru> <560B4899.2070708@yandex.ru> <83si5t7njo.fsf@gnu.org> <83zj015quz.fsf@gnu.org> <560E959A.4070905@yandex.ru> <83mvw15o5s.fsf@gnu.org> <560E9A8C.9060607@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443802381 17868 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2015 16:13:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 16:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 18:12:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi2wv-0007GQ-Tz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 18:12:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32888 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi2wv-0003Bs-HB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 12:12:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1oF-0006sU-Uv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1oF-0004M3-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:60343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi1o9-0004Jo-GI; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 10:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVL00B00LG7Y500@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:59:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVL00B42LNBY710@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:59:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <560E9A8C.9060607@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190704 Archived-At: > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, stephen@xemacs.org, dak@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:54:04 +0300 > > On 10/02/2015 05:40 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> Using `vc-next-action'? > > > > No. > > Then that doesn't refute that statement, does it? No. > "Still, AFAIK in typical usage of modern VCS, vc-next-action ends up > doing a commit about 99% of the time". We are talking about what vc-next-action _should_ do. I'm saying that it would make sense for it to always check whether update is needed, or maybe even actually do it.