From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Considered Harmful 73d213: 'Comint, term, and compile new set Emacs' Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:07:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83lh4plany.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oa9otixb.fsf@russet.org.uk> <5703E15B.7080601@cs.ucla.edu> <87k2kcovt8.fsf@russet.org.uk> <5704233B.4020103@cs.ucla.edu> <8737qzso88.fsf@russet.org.uk> <57045765.4000309@cs.ucla.edu> <87r3ei8vz9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <5705B246.10201@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460041711 31029 80.91.229.3 (7 Apr 2016 15:08:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Phillip Lord" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 07 17:08:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aoBXl-0003B5-Fu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:08:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoBXk-0001bc-NL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40381) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoBXT-0001Z6-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoBXP-00053A-3M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:08:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoBXP-000536-07; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2910 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aoBXO-0007AC-8T; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:08:02 -0400 In-reply-to: (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202797 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:35:23 +0100 > From: "Phillip Lord" > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@penguin.cs.ucla.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > Phillip Lord > > As a better alternatively, would it be possible to find a solution to > 20484 which does not involve EMACS=t? > > This would both address 20484 and 20202, rather than robbing Peter to pay > Paul. Bug#20484 is with a version of Bash that needs $EMACS to be set, right? If so, how can we solve it, if the changes to do that must be made in Bash?