From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Alignment and images Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:12:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83lh1pw5bt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831t3hxowt.fsf@gnu.org> <83twgdw9n7.fsf@gnu.org> <83por1w6ng.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467137977 27407 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2016 18:19:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:19:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 20:19:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHxbb-00042p-N8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:19:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38663 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHxbV-0007z5-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHxVN-0007lD-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHxVM-0006UG-KY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:13:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHxVM-0006U3-HQ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4496 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bHxVI-000655-K0; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:12:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:51:57 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204879 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:51:57 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Intangible doesn't work because we deprecated it, and set > > inhibit-point-motion-hooks to t; set it to nil, and it will work (but > > you really should use the newer replacements). > > That's `cursor-intangible'? Yes. > > However, this won't solve your problem, since the cursor position > > before the stretch will always be visited, as intangible doesn't > > affect it. > > > > We have on the C level a flag to avoid positioning cursor on a stretch > > glyph (we use it for line-prefix and wrap-prefix), but we don't expose > > it to Lisp. > > So... there is no easy way implement this in the current Emacs? I don't think so, but maybe someone else will come up with some rabbit-out-of-the-hat.