* emacs-25 version number
@ 2016-09-22 17:47 Glenn Morris
2016-09-23 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2016-09-22 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
If there is to be another release from the emacs-25 branch (?),
please (admin.el) M-x set-version in that branch to x.y.50. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-22 17:47 emacs-25 version number Glenn Morris
@ 2016-09-23 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-09-23 16:07 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2016-09-23 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:47:26 -0400
>
>
> If there is to be another release from the emacs-25 branch (?),
> please (admin.el) M-x set-version in that branch to x.y.50. Thanks.
Done.
Thanks for the reminder.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-23 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2016-09-23 16:07 ` Glenn Morris
2016-09-23 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-09-23 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2016-09-23 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
So master now targets 25.3?
As predicted, a bunch of bug metadata is now incorrect.
Plus all the instances of "25.2" in master.
These had better be changed before a merge from emacs-25 brings in other
"25.2" that actually do refer to 25.2.
Also, it is now unclear what "25.1.50" means in future bug reports.
(An old version of master, or a current version of emacs-25?)
I can't help feeling that this is a predictably confusing and
unsatisfactory state of affairs. I'm sorry for going on about this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-23 16:07 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2016-09-23 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-09-23 16:25 ` Paul Eggert
2016-09-23 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2016-09-23 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
> I can't help feeling that this is a predictably confusing and
> unsatisfactory state of affairs. I'm sorry for going on about this.
I can't help but feel like this was my mistake: I should have branched
emacs-25 (and renumbered master to 26.0.50) before stepping down.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-23 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2016-09-23 16:25 ` Paul Eggert
2016-09-23 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggert @ 2016-09-23 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier, emacs-devel
On 09/23/2016 09:16 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I should have branched
> emacs-25 (and renumbered master to 26.0.50) before stepping down.
How about if we renumber master to 26.0.50 now?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-23 16:25 ` Paul Eggert
@ 2016-09-23 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-09-26 21:54 ` John Wiegley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2016-09-23 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Eggert, John Wiegley; +Cc: monnier, emacs-devel
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:25:59 -0700
>
> On 09/23/2016 09:16 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I should have branched
> > emacs-25 (and renumbered master to 26.0.50) before stepping down.
>
> How about if we renumber master to 26.0.50 now?
If John agrees, I don't object.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-23 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2016-09-26 21:54 ` John Wiegley
2016-10-01 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: John Wiegley @ 2016-09-26 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Paul Eggert, monnier, emacs-devel
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> How about if we renumber master to 26.0.50 now?
> If John agrees, I don't object.
I'd actually like to see that happen, so definite agreement here.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-26 21:54 ` John Wiegley
@ 2016-10-01 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2016-10-01 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Wiegley; +Cc: eggert, monnier, emacs-devel
> From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:54:00 -0700
>
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> How about if we renumber master to 26.0.50 now?
>
> > If John agrees, I don't object.
>
> I'd actually like to see that happen, so definite agreement here.
Done.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: emacs-25 version number
2016-09-23 16:07 ` Glenn Morris
2016-09-23 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2016-09-23 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-09-23 19:06 ` Stefan Monnier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2016-09-23 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:07:21 -0400
>
> So master now targets 25.3?
Yes.
> As predicted, a bunch of bug metadata is now incorrect.
Can't help that.
> Plus all the instances of "25.2" in master.
People who care are encouraged to fix that. It cannot all be the job
of a single individual.
> Also, it is now unclear what "25.1.50" means in future bug reports.
> (An old version of master, or a current version of emacs-25?)
It's a question of time; soon enough this problem will go away.
> I can't help feeling that this is a predictably confusing and
> unsatisfactory state of affairs. I'm sorry for going on about this.
It is not helpful to repeat these arguments over and over and over
again. The danger was clear many moons ago, when the decision was
made, but it was made nonetheless. How it is useful to reiterate the
same arguments time and again? To what end?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-01 8:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-22 17:47 emacs-25 version number Glenn Morris
2016-09-23 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-09-23 16:07 ` Glenn Morris
2016-09-23 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-09-23 16:25 ` Paul Eggert
2016-09-23 18:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-09-26 21:54 ` John Wiegley
2016-10-01 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-09-23 17:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-09-23 19:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-09-23 19:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).