From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving representation of EIEIO objects in backtraces/error messages Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 09:45:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83lguxuagf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ful6o8x4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83o9zutr1m.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9zump6w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483083961 28640 195.159.176.226 (30 Dec 2016 07:46:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 30 08:45:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMrsy-0006eC-LD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 08:45:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMrt3-0005zu-Av for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:46:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMrsV-0005zo-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:45:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMrsR-0004ZF-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:45:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMrsQ-0004Z6-UD; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:45:22 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2034 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cMrsQ-0005nJ-Di; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 02:45:22 -0500 In-reply-to: <87o9zump6w.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (message from Eric Abrahamsen on Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:54:15 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210986 Archived-At: > From: Eric Abrahamsen > Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:54:15 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Eric Abrahamsen > >> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:02:47 -0800 > >> > >> Can I open a bug report? > > > > Sure, you don't need a permission for that. > > Done, as #25295. Sometimes it seems like a wontfix or early-stage > responses are better got on emacs-devel, but maybe that's not necessary. There's nothing wrong with wontfix: the bug is still recorded by the tracker, and someone, some day could decide to fix it. Therefore, asking here should not be necessary, but there's nothing wrong with that, either. Thanks.