From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: libnettle/libhogweed WIP Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:25:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83lgr0g986.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a89gq3us.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmtjiv0w.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <83o9xjn06c.fsf@gnu.org> <87shmeb5ln.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <83y3w5z1ez.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgr6yakj.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wpamww9k.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8337daggnj.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1cdwxt6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83tw5pg1q3.fsf@gnu.org> <87zifhulc2.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492323925 5594 195.159.176.226 (16 Apr 2017 06:25:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 06:25:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 16 08:25:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1czdcc-0001Ch-0f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 08:25:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59376 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czdcg-0002mF-2v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czdc6-0002lz-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czdc3-0003Tc-RU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:24:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1czdc3-0003TY-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3412 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1czdc3-0006Tg-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 02:24:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <87zifhulc2.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Sat, 15 Apr 2017 22:39:57 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213990 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 22:39:57 -0400 > > EZ> Buffer text is just a C string (with the slight complication of the > EZ> gap), so I don't understand why you'd need to rewrite code that much. > > Like I said, the first 150 lines of secure_hash() demonstrate the > complexity. Most of that is encoding the text, which is not relevant to your functions. What's left is about 10 lines for a string and 30 for a buffer substring, not too much IMO.