From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C++ qualified method names Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 15:37:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83lgpjkd44.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mva0j6tn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495802334 7200 195.159.176.226 (26 May 2017 12:38:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 12:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 26 14:38:50 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEEW1-0001jm-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 14:38:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36564 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEEW5-00055D-BC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:38:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEEV9-0004gT-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:37:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEEV6-0001gI-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:37:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEEV6-0001gC-2v; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:37:52 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4879 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dEEV5-0004k3-5j; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:37:51 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Yuri Khan on Fri, 26 May 2017 17:15:40 +0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215213 Archived-At: > From: Yuri Khan > Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 17:15:40 +0700 > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Emacs developers > > > void > > regcache::raw_supply_integer (int foo) > > { > > whatever (foo); > > } > > > > invoking "M-: (c-defun-name) RET" produces "raw_supply_integer". Why > > does it exclude the class qualification? Is there a way to have that > > included? This is important e.g. when producing a ChangeLog entry for > > such methods. > > This is a good question that opens a can of worms. > > What if the clasess is in a namespace? Do you want to include the > namespace, too? …the whole chain of namespaces up to the root? What if > some of them are inline namespaces? > > What if the method is overloaded on argument types? …on method > cv-qualifiers and ref-qualifiers? > > What if the thing on which (c-defun-name) is a function template? …a > class template? …an explicit specialization? …a partial > specialization? Since it is easier to delete than to type, I guess my answer would be "all of the above".