From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 22:22:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83lg8dt8ni.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5a2c709e-aa49-b5b6-3fbe-fb8bd33acb23@cs.ucla.edu> <06d01a4b-9d98-df5b-be8a-aeda449acad7@cs.ucla.edu> <83bm99vijd.fsf@gnu.org> <831sa5v192.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnxptegl.fsf@gnu.org> <73af367c-34b0-62f9-6798-4be301f80594@cs.ucla.edu> <83musttayo.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1536348030 22575 195.159.176.226 (7 Sep 2018 19:20:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 19:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 21:20:26 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fyMIq-0005jp-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 21:20:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40023 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fyMKw-0002s9-QB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:22:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fyMKq-0002qp-BT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fyMKm-0001LM-V1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fyMKm-0001LB-Qr; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:22:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1340 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fyMKm-0003Tq-EI; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:22:24 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:05:18 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:229444 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:05:18 -0700 > Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Sure, but the point is that GCC does not lay out structures identically > on MS-Windows vs GNU/Linux. If it makes an exception for bitfields it > may very well make an exception for long long. Yes, the facts are unequivocal. I just don't understand why the different behavior.