From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: accumulated timers which machine is in suspend-to-ram Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:29:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfzz3lpr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874l6rc8wf.fsf@web.de> <83h8aq8ruq.fsf@gnu.org> <871s1t29ku.fsf@web.de> <83k1fl6gtb.fsf@gnu.org> <874l6o5u95.fsf@web.de> <83r29r3nb5.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8anx40n.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="31295"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 24 09:33:23 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hJCPC-00081s-Ke for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:33:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37253 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJCPB-0005ki-Dq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 03:33:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47821) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJCNs-0005iF-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 03:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJCLO-0004C3-Au; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 03:29:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4256 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hJCLL-0001ED-UC; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 03:29:25 -0400 In-reply-to: <87h8anx40n.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:21:12 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235848 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:21:12 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > That's strange, because if you have the same problem as Stefan, I > > think this is veteran functionality, see my response in bug#35400. > > Yes, strange indeed. But I'm very sure that the original issue (Emacs > busy for quite a long time after wake up) is new. So you are unable to reproduce in Emacs 26? > The latest commits somehow changed the behavior, so the reason is > probably not as trivial as the bug report suggests. Maybe the 10 is > not honored anymore because of the integer conversions? Or > something like that? Do you see more than 10 repetitions of the same timer? Does the variable control how many repetitions you see?