From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabs Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 21:56:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83lftx1z4x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a7bpysm8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875zlnu9ds.fsf@web.de> <87blvdxpr0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878sqhtbm3.fsf@web.de> <87v9tgnndn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h84npa5e.fsf@web.de> <87imp2vns4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a7aeth9c.fsf@web.de> <874l0mhy85.fsf@web.de> <834l0l3gsh.fsf@gnu.org> <875zl1pxm4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="65290"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 06 20:59:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBkF-000Gnb-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 20:59:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBkD-0004pi-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBi1-0004Cu-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:56:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBi1-0007lp-3G; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:56:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2904 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iHBhx-00053G-V6; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 14:56:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <875zl1pxm4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 06 Oct 2019 20:55:31 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240661 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: Michael Heerdegen , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 20:55:31 +0300 > > I can reproduce the redisplay issue, I never seen this before, > maybe some recent change broke redisplaying. > > I tried to debug and in redisplay_internal, the value of > garbaged_frame_retries has a very large number - about thousands > order of magnitude. It never resets the 'garbaged' flag set in the > selected frame. And I have no idea how to force the 'garbaged' flag > to be reset. It infloops in these lines: > > /* On some platforms (at least MS-Windows), the > scroll_run_hook called from scrolling_window > called from update_frame could set the frame's > garbaged flag, in which case we need to > redisplay the frame. */ > if (FRAME_GARBAGED_P (f)) > goto retry_frame; I need a reproducer. Can you provide one?