From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: evaluating numbers Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:10:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83lfsi5z1s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875zjw2emg.fsf@gmx.net> <618B38D9-CD34-4200-8CA1-1A6B0922A83A@traduction-libre.org> <871ruk2d3f.fsf@gmx.net> <3C929D7B-1C10-4713-9EDA-55C80FC36AD8@traduction-libre.org> <835zjvg385.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgmyd6rw.fsf@gnu.org> <835zjucwbz.fsf@gnu.org> <628A3663-BDD3-47C5-B4F4-E260FD900691@traduction-libre.org> <83o8xla50f.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ex9sow.fsf@gnu.org> <4836980E-C425-466C-BB86-5E962C4B3F96@traduction-libre.org> <83zhgy7qxq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="177873"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 15:11:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFq5-000k9x-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:11:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFq3-0008PN-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:11:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFpX-0008PE-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:10:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFpW-0002nW-Kp; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:10:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4652 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iVFpW-0007K1-0I; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:10:38 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Yuri Khan on Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:46:21 +0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242164 Archived-At: > From: Yuri Khan > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:46:21 +0700 > Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary , > Emacs developers > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 16:26, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > A non-confusing solution to the issue “I have a code point and I’d > like to know which character that is, but I don’t want Emacs to spend > time trying all fonts to see if any of them has a glyph” could be to > show the Unicode name for code points greater than > eval-expression-print-maximum-character and less than (max-char). > > 232 (#o350, #xe8, LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE) > 1114109 (#o4177775, #x10fffd, ) I don't think this is less confusing, and I'm not really interested in opening that old debate again. The train has left the station, so people who are unhappy with the current defaults should customize the option we provided back then.