From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [Was: bug#25148:] Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 19:43:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83lfsazbmu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87pnhq7mxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <834kz25qp9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <83sgmm4a08.fsf@gnu.org> <87h832xqxr.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191117192558.GC11551@ACM> <87a78uxot6.fsf@telefonica.net> <87a78uuvde.fsf@gnus.org> <8853390e-f4a5-c295-4f94-cf417ec8db5f@yandex.ru> <83wobv2684.fsf@gnu.org> <878soakddl.fsf@gnus.org> <83wobuzf8y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="149785"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, larsi@gnus.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 18:45:31 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXU2j-000ckJ-SE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:45:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33029 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXU2i-0006mE-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:45:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iXU1I-0006Gf-Bc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iXU1H-0007ZM-Sz; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:43:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3376 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iXU14-0008HV-4k; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:43:46 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:53:09 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242518 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:53:09 +0000 > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Óscar Fuentes , > emacs-devel , Richard Stallman , Dmitry Gutov > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 4:27 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Of course, if somebody wants to hit the "merge pull request" button > > > in Gitlab, they can do that, but for most smaller pull requests, > > > Gitlab would just email the patch (presumably) and we can apply it > > > locally on our machines before pushing to the repo, just like now. > > > > What you describe is not the PR workflow that people are used to. > > I don't think it's very far off, though. Here's my usual workflow with > GitHub, in the hope that it helps the discussion: AFAIU, you described the wokflow of a developer, not of a contributor. I was rather talking about the latter, and mainly before their PR is accepted and merged.