From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-27 60c84ad: ; * etc/TODO: Fix last change. Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:04:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83lfogw1gn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200229173124.11831.98476@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200229173125.E2D3A21167@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83zhczxa2t.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeuay0ch.fsf@gnu.org> <83d09txw29.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="91759"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 04 17:06:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j9WXe-000NkX-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 17:06:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36238 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9WXd-0001Am-2L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:06:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9WW5-0007Pu-Fb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9WW5-0003bP-51; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3143 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j9WW4-0008Bo-HA; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 11:05:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Wed, 04 Mar 2020 10:25:45 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245223 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 10:25:45 +0100 > > One issue this has thrown up is that the hypothetical 'emoji' script > completely subsumes U+1F000..U+1F02F (mahjong-tile) and > U+1F030..U+1F09F (domino-tile), so those scripts would no longer > exist. That shouldn't happen. The 'emoji' script should include the following blocks: 1F300 .. 1F5FF (Miscellaneous Symbols and Pictographs) 1F600 .. 1F64F (Emoticons) 1F680 .. 1F6FF (Transport and Map Symbols) 1F900 .. 1F9FF (Supplemental Symbols and Pictographs) I understand that there are scattered Emoji elsewhere, but even if we make them individually belong to Emoji, we don't need to do that for mahjong-tile and domino-tile blocks. > Eli> There's an issue with the codepoints in the U+2XXX and U+3XXX blocks: > Eli> some of them can have Emoji glyph variations, but putting them into > Eli> the 'emoji' script is probably not a good idea, as long as Emacs > Eli> selects a font based on a single character. I guess we will have to > Eli> leave them in 'symbol' for now. > > Robert> OK. We can revisit 2XXX and 3XXX later. > > Your concern here is what Emacs should do when one of the characters in this > range is followed by U+FE0E or U+FE0F? The latter. The former doesn't affect the visual appearance of those base characters, so it's basically a no-op.