From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: (emacs) Intro [was: Making Emacs popular again with a video]
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 10:28:13 +0300
Message-ID: <83lflbqjxu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <779cc2b0-c546-2a80-afd3-79f10bda1b7e@yandex.ru>
 <M7K5NN6--3-2@tutanota.com>
 <d28fe30d-c192-8022-b758-d8b7019e49b5@yandex.ru-M7KnL6R----2>
 <M7Z2BX5--3-2@tutanota.com> <M7hGIi9--7-2@tutanota.com>
 <d66793e5-07f9-4dd9-928d-e7e8c342b781@default> <M7iByNw--3-2@tutanota.com>
 <M7sSK-m--3-2@tutanota.com-M7sSUVm--3-2> <M8Nrg9A--3-2@tutanota.com>
 <CADwFkm=tke5mkbTD8r_hpUqJj2Msp45bA_oVAh3zLJ5z0EoKxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <M8TI028--3-2@tutanota.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="21952"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: excalamus@tutanota.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 29 09:30:16 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jeZT6-0005cS-87
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:30:16 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43738 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jeZT5-00068E-4p
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 03:30:15 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46166)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jeZRH-00037Y-Oh
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 03:28:23 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50085)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jeZRH-0004Wl-5Z; Fri, 29 May 2020 03:28:23 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4003 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jeZRE-0003ZT-Tf; Fri, 29 May 2020 03:28:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <M8TI028--3-2@tutanota.com> (emacs-devel@gnu.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251608
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/251608>

> Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 04:39:03 +0200 (CEST)
> Cc: "excalamus--- via Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
>  Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> From: excalamus--- via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> > May 28, 2020, 03:08 by > eliz@gnu.org> :
> >
> > I think at this time and place, there's only one Emacs.  What
> > "non-GNU" Emacsen are there that still need to be kept in mind?
> >
> GNU Emacs definitely dominates now.  Yet, GNU Emacs is not the only Emacs.

Again, what other Emacsen still need to be kept in mind?  They are all
dead, AFAIK.  Why allude to them in a document that will see light in
a year or two at the earliest?  It will just confuse people.