From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: buffer-face-set changes the fringe, is it a bug? Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 19:41:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83lfjwsiin.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2E75863E-82E2-4D61-AD34-0282362C6E99@gnu.org> <835zb2t1t8.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31977"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 06 18:44:57 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jsUEj-0008B2-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 18:44:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39148 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jsUEi-0008Ax-8O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jsUBO-00029I-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:41:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jsUBM-0002z9-M3; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2728 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jsUBL-0005Ig-TS; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:41:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: (emacs-devel@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252728 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 14:22:16 +0200 (CEST) > From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." > > So it seems that it's only when a face remapping takes place that an > omitted face in [1] means using the default face. Before the face > remapping takes place, the fringe face is used instead. No, it uses the default face, but the result is produced slightly differently (not by actually merging the two faces).