From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ...
 modes
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:52:33 +0200
Message-ID: <83lfbm7ku6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20210213141225.11309.86562@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmmabGLP1Pqnt8O_6RZ53bM_eHBXgA5bKW=Hec5FyVvXPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <83y2fq9f0v.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0r8xl7y.fsf@gnus.org> <834kic9g0a.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8735xwvusc.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9as7xns.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn10ueld.fsf@gnus.org>
 <83r1lf9apm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6s3vrnd.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8gj9a8o.fsf@gnu.org>
 <871rdfvq86.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7mb98g8.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8gjuaez.fsf@gnus.org>
 <83ft1v97bk.fsf@gnu.org> <877dn7u7wq.fsf@gnus.org> <835z2r94zw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmnunmgeXUgZmaUOKt74d=xH80X5FcPSG4e1BB6uYYE2RA@mail.gmail.com>
 <831rdf91r1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft1vsmf5.fsf@gnus.org>
 <664f975c-9770-6d58-28be-d1bc8cd6bca5@yandex.ru>
 <CADwFkm=F8SDG3zR0pKoubPxBxYH3Wb1mNOOPpsAZ7q0H=Wf-ag@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="26045"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 16:53:05 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lCP8S-0006ez-Q7
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:53:04 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43834 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lCP8R-0004Wc-Sz
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:53:03 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49604)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1lCP7r-00044M-Jm
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:52:27 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48907)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lCP7r-0003AS-7O; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:52:27 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4756
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lCP7q-0007j3-DF; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:52:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkm=F8SDG3zR0pKoubPxBxYH3Wb1mNOOPpsAZ7q0H=Wf-ag@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:50:55 -0800)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265010
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/265010>

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:50:55 -0800
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > You're extending it in an incompatible way, one that most third-party
> > code won't be able to make use of for years to come.
> 
> I don't think the second half of this sentence is correct.  Please see
> my compatibility macro `future-interactive' posted to this list.

The alternative solutions don't need such shims, which is an
advantage.