From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:39:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83lf4mnet4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <87o89kw0hl.fsf@gnus.org> <0c369b25-aedd-1fdf-4813-503f27e42c7c@yandex.ru> <874kbbznwv.fsf@gmail.com> <8735qvwcqt.fsf@gmail.com> <20210828065708.GA29375@tuxteam.de> <83v93qnhhs.fsf@gnu.org> <20210828075355.GB29375@tuxteam.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 10:40:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJttL-000A3q-0w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:40:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33528 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJttJ-0004VC-7N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtsT-0003p5-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtsT-0001g3-1z; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1879 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtsS-0002g5-LE; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:39:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210828075355.GB29375@tuxteam.de> (tomas@tuxteam.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273252 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:53:55 +0200 > From: tomas@tuxteam.de > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > On top of that, some MUAs (again, the same) don't know what a > > > Message-ID is and thread based on Subject. Resulting in monster > > > threads with the incredibly informative Subject "Re:". > > > > That's what Rmail does, and I have yet to see a significant problem > > with it, let alone that it broke my workflows. > > You mean it doesn't honour Message-ID/In-Reply-To/and References > when they are there? It does, but not for threading purposes. Rmail's equivalent of threading commands are rmail-next-same-subject and rmail-previous-same-subject; the names of those commands already tell you what it does. It doesn't have any other notion of threads, AFAIK, and doesn't allow display of messages by threads, except grouping them by Subject.