From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem with some new emoji in Emacs Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 08:35:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83lf1rw8ga.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <83o86nx13c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26984"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 07:36:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mm97q-0006mL-H9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:36:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55046 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm97p-0001Uq-51 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:36:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm97D-0000ki-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:35:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=44266 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm97D-0007UR-KI; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:35:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=dXp3ottexrVUS07YOdutVAxSocCFsXnti5L3fmcuMZ8=; b=NLXyJWbKnkppg4MP+WBS 09s80Br4dZSHbpRTHAFB3uGMbzfgCLdwvl3HC1Gesi6kY+WFpIR/7ino2leYv/75F0UEXlN9F3oYs iNg0gkK/PscZNoCWjgp7T3LWBcrrVA75MlCCqkHN0VQH+4nrsWYHaFR6PYmCpQXkbwnwkxgFmvjHg fc6MyaxbH3JgrbzK2lgeY9/w5kQh4uUsrq9JQ2H2Nap/4KcO7fh40SwhBzTvs7rtFFbyIfzgrhPAF k3vMQ+a4hxTCXm6Y0+wZ6iD9aPT2aFjCatJYHFeGnqZwUvsYt6AQrCek1xsMyvCPGmuxWbWLWG6Qm ZaaWjnVranhniw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2137 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm97D-0003mv-4J; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:35:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Jean Louis on Sat, 13 Nov 2021 23:49:35 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279379 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 23:49:35 +0300 > From: Jean Louis > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > When I use describe-char I can see that ✔ and ✔️ are same now on my > screen but they don't activate What do you mean by "don't activate"? > so the first one I see smaller, second one emojified. Are you sure this is unrelated to emojify-mode? The second one requests an Emoji-style presentation, the first one doesn't. > In emojify-mode when I insert the char, it becomes automatically > recognized. What do you mean by "recognized"? > I have closed this file, opened it again, and again I see difference > between ✔ and ✔️ here visually, but describe-char tells me about > different fonts used. That's what should happen: the U+FE0F VARIATION SELECTOR 16 character requests the preceding character to be displayed as Emoji. So what you see is Emacs 28 and later behaving as designed, and as the Unicode Standard says it should behave.