From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any new method to deal with Emacs Fonts settings puzzles nearly every Chinese =?utf-8?Q?emacser=EF=BC=9F?= Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 10:14:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83lf1rupb1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2c676019.21d2.17d19ba2dc8.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <838rxsxes6.fsf@gnu.org> <165ffaaf53a0f38af0415eb4e6b7844f@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <87bl2nppt6.fsf@163.com> <877ddbpp1y.fsf@163.com> <83zgq7ur1r.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1bj6uke.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22800"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: psainty@orcon.net.nz, tumashu@163.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 09:15:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mmAfp-0005mt-V0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 09:15:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47750 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmAfo-0007t1-Cz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 03:15:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmAev-00072I-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 03:14:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=47028 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmAeu-0002Hk-P2; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 03:14:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=9EveqyZ2qVq3B8AAsymmB/7v5xdXFeFgUHjvnOaO864=; b=Ww3UDQWx4uzSC4vl7XVe argMf4xKqvfhpSLPCeo0uk2RQvmMP5CBTTxQQ2tRWhMcZucTGyeLhQ3Rfb5CmIEaHFdX9SG0ZfZnV 9w5kpP+oCobsWth68dzlDKYg9PTuCp46LgnYv1ywUdK/KSUtGDCWABqATm2z/f1IpUbRqeYJHFj9p ZBKeGcA4JtAcB76T+6Uvf9bnh8qxXM8vPX6lQecWDJBzWev8xvpfFvT26U8Kb8hxxrv3TYZ026jjt teg6HsDgxNIDKyMljOLf10VEp5Fm/urgSKXxIYP599i5sX5LseYVkenCaN+LR5/JrhER74rlrofmY 8wEhVMDPD4PpXw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4212 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mmAeu-0006sO-0l; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 03:14:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r1bj6uke.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:54:41 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279399 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: "Feng Shu" , psainty@orcon.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 15:54:41 +0800 > > > Would someone please investigate how do other GUI editors solve this > > problem, and post a summary? I'm sure there are better solutions than > > asking users to provide pixel values for each pair of fonts. > > >From a quick investigation (not at all conclusive) of GNOME Builder, it > seems to define some fixed height for its various 'bars', which doesn't > change based on the characters inside. > > Other GUI editors behave similarly. But I have no significant > experience with them to speak of. And what do they do with the width issue?