From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : emacs-28 windows binaries available from alpha Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 11:25:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83leyoz6qp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834k5d3hbv.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmo11wij.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsox19of.fsf@gnu.org> <838rup14ft.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8xsz9nu.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25619"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, corwin@bru.st, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 06 10:29:07 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGdr0-0006SV-L4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 10:29:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGdqz-0000jU-Jc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 04:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGdo8-0006lf-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 04:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=54000 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGdo7-00024F-Gx; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 04:26:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=LrU3w7PNtJbMlF+IalebZBmZU0SnOhS6KbxA+75yGAg=; b=BVTLQofIv+ck UNKYzRjCQgdNdRbXHqLJUzljVd4JrC6SYmoz2e9VAlgkrM+JStPpyVw4E+Hs49fGZFJBbBdxFD0mP Hr9eyk5hYgI6l5z8PP4/XXZtt8Y2htnUbqlBHPXs1oQpkOoTA5m8B3qRE5CX49Dv0mt1QDvqp9ZL0 GxGB2m3+RxeS53OWf1AL6VmmrsW7PvmYM8VbTiF0PzpZCS8O0fg+6Cl2j4CNcRWNbKgd5joqwn94D 8F//iBm0WiqSC8DfPfW0/ldmhjpVqcLSN4mCYJhBZ/nUOb9slTx9A1YZHWCv9ucYe73mKi82LUlUV DiwSpydQuuGL4CxY3OkliQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3534 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nGdo6-0000Xw-UT; Sun, 06 Feb 2022 04:26:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sun, 6 Feb 2022 08:51:11 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285946 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > CC: "corwin@bru.st" , > "dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de" > , > "emacs-devel@gnu.org" > Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 08:51:11 +0000 > > > > > IMO, no. It's a feature: when we specify an extension we get exactly > > > > what we ask for, when we specify without any extension we get the > > > > default behavior of favoring the most compiled version available, > > > > creating the ELN if we can when we have an ELC but no ELN. > > > > > > Isn't that what's happening? It tries to load the ELC. > > > > Happening where? > > In the problem I reported. I thought Corwin was > suggesting that it didn't try to load the ELC > and then compile it to ELN. In the problem you reported here: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-02/msg00160.html indeed Emacs didn't try to compile the .elc file to a .eln. Like I said: yours was a different situation, not the one about which Dieter asked his question.