From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: OKURI-NASI Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 14:39:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83leujjlkj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y1ykxfd2.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu98xf5q.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtezkb3r.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilpnxsfw.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5309"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 30 13:45:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nvdqQ-0001CI-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 13:45:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59748 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvdqP-0004LI-66 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 07:45:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvdkZ-0001O4-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2022 07:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvdkZ-0003So-7J; Mon, 30 May 2022 07:39:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=WMW1oRux78LwniSsAGGlLMK2W7Ozc9CPqDi7SRpX0FQ=; b=TZLPxDWJZJhL piIeLoZWZZ6X3w/qW7hX+U2Lh+SWCCZNEn+m/WOrQhF47k8Akf1HjFE2f2UKZ6ebXnUtWIl+UkTRx Ukx/XR+xNgsgKVKvSiT0TMJMPfmf7S3ZAbW5UMSCNFlnUqJqNq3lzIwGduqTr68wgNuJqK9xhOuBv QauLkCEX5IShYqlSNJmqtppcY4It0BL5iQmUBDKtIyCm0i864/FYtHdvr0V/+j6hxtr2lvshHOQnl jv1shB02htjNhkitYJ5gwhgg/e6QLQGWBjS9cN1JGfSVYHvLROH/6EW6kvZLqdlvCU/WJnHgIJSA/ bOVFEZzd8P/dPn3VUtr04A==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1762 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nvdkY-0002Pw-Fq; Mon, 30 May 2022 07:39:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ilpnxsfw.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 30 May 2022 11:47:47 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290376 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 11:47:47 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I don't know if we need it that early. The only way to know is to > > try. We seem to need it before loaddefs.el is generated, at least. > > Do we need the ja-dic.el file before loaddefs.el? Sorry, we don't. I was confused/coffee-challenged. > We need leim-list.el, I think, and leim/Makefile generates both of > those files, so I think if we just decouple those things, then we > move the ja-dic.el compilation later. Does moving it later speed up its compilation considerably?