From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:51:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83ledqatmt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <97224c4f-fad4-ae01-46c1-5755d97d9a92@gutov.dev> <87fs3ztq38.fsf@localhost> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87y1hroz47.fsf@posteo.net> <83cyz2ctp0.fsf@gnu.org> <87msy6rzeg.fsf@localhost> <83wmxab0ym.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8cuqg8d.fsf@localhost> <83ttseava1.fsf@gnu.org> <50c351cf-4c7b-5497-a561-ba1b9f63d1c8@gutov.dev> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18038"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, philipk@posteo.net, luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 15:52:31 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4ZZ-0004S8-UE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 15:52:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4ZN-0002S2-C9; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:52:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4ZL-0002Rb-E2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:52:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4ZJ-000431-GM; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:52:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=U6ZeK6GHn3EmYG1aWxThQWzTs9Mbph660ndaQW+i6SE=; b=nxbcs8Q252Nj MEaeEzmlNFa/UxWw0rqS5YJ2R/YESUPCMyvTrEGmaQGmflAuMOUZGUc4rKuipYDt+Gd8fMicaWc9B 5E+h+Vn6HicUPJNDG6LDINf8a8dWrVFs0yCo/NpFga4+n34MSOHP4fbbz8D+vVseOKpeLlqxOfTiV K6KIwde9P8a91RW3O8CJe76AkDAFHA0REVZSUJnjLFl7wJENooB7SvJe2RuXHFGYrucEvXXhhhK9o yUHdpQKXZSzWOe+m+fQfoC6J672NMJ8uk1nHAOATbclQAgX4xz/wbKBlsPq8GQiMjuvyF2WFCIxXM qyATijgJg+Q8KMqrh96hcw==; In-Reply-To: <50c351cf-4c7b-5497-a561-ba1b9f63d1c8@gutov.dev> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:44:35 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309795 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:44:35 +0300 > Cc: jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, philipk@posteo.net, luangruo@yahoo.com, > stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 01/09/2023 16:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> I can turn them off selectively in my MUA. > >> IMHO, this is not any different from how I approach mailing lists - most > >> of the discussions on ML are not interesting to me and I simply filter > >> them out. I think Gnus scoring is relevant (although I use different > >> approach). > > How is this consistent with complaints about the difficulties of using > > a MUA in sophisticated ways? > > Very consistent: people who find using a MUA in complex ways difficult > don't set up additional filtering and usually don't complain about it > (the default volume of notifications usually seems fine for me, for > example). > > What's odd is when people who know how to set up MUA filters and > everything produce such complaints. Such responses make me wish I never participated in this discussion.