From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr smart server [was Re: Locks on the Bzr repository] Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:11:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83k4nlp5tl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282324275 13954 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2010 17:11:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, schwab@linux-m68k.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 19:11:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmV7R-0003kf-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:11:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmV7Q-0006RV-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54785 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmV7K-0006RO-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmV7J-0003bv-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:10:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:38206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmV7J-0003bp-By; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L7G00C00NMQ6W00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:10:56 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.220.100]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L7G00AJNNQ65YT0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:10:56 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128931 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:56:36 +0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jan.h.d@swipnet.se,=20 > =09Andreas Schwab , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca= , emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > >> Worst of all, no progress is being reported regarding turning on > >> bzr+ssh on savannah. =C2=A0It's been 9 months since work on this= was > >> supposed to have been started, enough time to deliver a baby, an= d I > >> have no idea when (or if) this will happen. =C2=A0Could those "i= n the know" > >> please tell what is holding this back? =C2=A0Given the informati= on about > >> the difficulties, maybe someone, whose connection is not so fast= and > >> whose motivation is therefore high, could help. > > > > I have no inside knowledge, but I like to depress myself by follo= wing > > the thread on the Savannah mailing list. > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers-public/2010-07= /msg00008.html > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers-public/2010-08= /msg00001.html >=20 >=20 > It looks like there are real reasons behind the slow migration to > bzr+ssh according to the link Sylvain gave: >=20 > http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/Bzr No real reason could ever be able to explain a 9-month period during which it was _not_ done.