From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bidi Subject: Re: Arabic support Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:54:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83k4n2j2si.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bp8oml9c.fsf@gnu.org> <83r5hbi3ur.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283525709 5636 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2010 14:55:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-bidi@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 16:55:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrXfX-0006DW-Fz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:55:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59806 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrXfW-0004pj-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47569 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrXfN-0004mS-Pn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:54:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrXfM-0007yp-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:54:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:62582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrXfK-0007yI-2h; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L8600M00EP8XV00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:54:03 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.202.93]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L8600M1MEQ1X210@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:54:03 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129651 gmane.emacs.bidi:817 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:08:55 +0900 > Cc: emacs-bidi@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org > > In article <83r5hbi3ur.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > Yes. And auto-composition-mode cannot be turned off for any > > > scripts that it is not enough to display glyphs > > > corresponding to characters; they are all Indics, some East > > > Asians, Arabic, Hebrew, etc. > > > Are you sure Hebrew belongs to this list? What Hebrew characters need > > to be shaped together, but still displayed as separate glyphs (as > > opposed to the diacriticals which are composed into the same glyph > > with the base character)? > > ??? I didn't write such a thing. What I listed are scripts > "that it is not enough to display glyphs corresponding to > characters". More precisely, "... that it is not enough to > display glyphs corresponding to characters at normal > positions suggested by each glyph metrics.". Sorry for my misunderstanding.