From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: @dircategory entries sync'ed with info/dir Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:30:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83k4gxuzr1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oc69v2z8.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipwhs6y2.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298043027 792 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2011 15:30:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 18 16:30:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqSHm-0006wl-A5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:30:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqSHl-0000JQ-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60981 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqSHe-0000Hh-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:30:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqSHc-0006zT-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:36240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqSHc-0006zL-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LGT00900K7UIT00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:30:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.140.24]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LGT009W9KE3F6B0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:30:09 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87ipwhs6y2.fsf@gmx.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136184 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:23:01 +0100 > > You have also changed > > trampver.texi [emacs]: Set emacsname to "Emacs". Yes, sorry, I meant to mention that, but forgot. > I would prefer to keep "GNU Emacs", because at some places the manual > discusses shortly differences to "XEmacs", and I want to make it obvious > what we are speaking about. That's fine, but can we then remove the use of emacsname in the @dircategory directive, and use "Emacs" instead? The reason I changed that is the info/dir's category is "Emacs network features", so if Tramp says "GNU Emacs network features", it will not match. Alternatively, we could have a separate variable, say, emacsdircategory, which would be "Emacs network features" for Emacs and "XEmacs" for XEmacs. Would you prefer this instead?