From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't use revision numbers on commit messages (and elsewhere). Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:13:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83k4fdyebs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877hbfvwyo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <834o6iquye.fsf@gnu.org> <83zkoapff5.fsf@gnu.org> <878vvuuh61.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301685978 27296 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2011 19:26:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 21:26:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5jz2-0003Mv-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:26:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36654 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5jnN-0007vd-Tu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34130 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5jnG-0007tW-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5jnE-0008Tz-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:14:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:51052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5jnE-0008Tl-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:14:00 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LIZ00700MPBW800@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:13:59 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.47.180]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LIZ007EBMR9V830@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:13:59 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <878vvuuh61.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138017 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar Fuentes > Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:26:14 +0200 >=20 > Eli Zaretskii writes: >=20 > >> The rev id _is_ the whole DAG. > > > > But if I don't have some of the branches, those parts of the DAG = are > > not on my machine. And I want to have them, pronto. >=20 > If you have the revision, you already have the DAG that contains al= l its > predecessors. The logs only mention the revision IDs, so what I have the revision ID, not the revision itself.